Thursday, 31 July 2008
Sca Fell
Wednesday, 30 July 2008
Half A Horseshoe
Tuesday, 29 July 2008
Tenets Of Wisdom
Old Bob
Sunday, 27 July 2008
Straight, Unbending Law Of Herons
Wasdale
Saturday, 26 July 2008
Colin Mortlock
Colin Mortlock - rock climber, teacher, outdoors enthusiast, writer, author of The Adventure Alternative (1984) and Beyond Adventure (2001), inventor of the climbing wall. Can this be the only photo of him on the World Wide Web?From Beyond Adventure.
Mad, Mystic Moments
There was always the sense that I was experiencing something I could never really understand let alone explain.
They were unexpected and unpredictable. I would suggest therefore that trying to seek them would be counter-productive. I had hoped in my older and wiser years that my long, solo wilderness journeys would increase the likelihood of their happening, but I knew I could never make them happen. They were beyond control and more elusive than rainbows.
They were timeless. The ego or unconscious self was suspended; thinking was suspended. In terms of feelings - and words are inadequate here - individuality was replaced by a merging of performer and action, observer and observed, person and place.
They were immeasurable, and yet I felt they were of elemental importance in any quest for happiness.
The beauty of the experience was awe inspiring and unforgettable.
They could happen anywhere. They might be expected to occur at places of worship, gardens and in the presence of artefact and architecture which intensely affect the emotions. Inevitably, because of my own enthusiasm for adventure and wilderness, I could see the latter as the major environment for such experiences, and especially when alone. It is possible that being aware that such experiences exist, spending time away from other people, and developing a natural skill and a sense of place may help to create an atmosphere where they occur.
I could have sworn I met Colin Mortlock half-way up Sca Fell on Thursday morning. If not, he was a dead ringer for the guy in the photo on the back cover of his book.
Saturday, 19 July 2008
The 300 Mark
Half Revealing, Half Concealing
The sonorous, melancholy style of the 18th century poet Thomas Gray has brought to mind another poet, but a much greater one; one whose life spanned the subsequent century of the Victorian era: Alfred Lord Tennyson.I sometimes hold it half a sin
To put in words the grief I feel;
For words, like Nature, half reveal
And half conceal the Soul within.
But, for the unquiet heart and brain,
A use in measured language lies;
The sad mechanic exercise,
Like dull narcotics, numbing pain.
In words, like weeds, I'll wrap me o'er,
Like coarsest clothes against the cold:
But that large grief which these enfold
Is given in outline and no more.
I cannot rest from travel: I will drink
Life to the lees: all times I have enjoy'd
Greatly, have suffer'd greatly, both with those
That loved me, and alone...
The lights begin to twinkle from the rocks:
The long day wanes: the slow moon climbs: the deep
Moans round with many voices. Come, my friends,
'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
Do these sentiments remind anybody of the older Yeats, the Yeats who wrote An aged man is but a paltry thing,/A tattered coat upon a stick (Sailing To Byzantium) but who also wrote Why should not old men be mad? (Why Should Not Old Men Be Mad?) But I am not content (Are You Content?) and A foolish, passionate man (A Prayer For Old Age)?
There is sweet music here that softer falls
Than petals from blown roses on the grass,
Or night-dews on still waters between walls
Of shadowy granite, in a gleaming pass;
Music that gentlier on the spirit lies,
Than tir'd eyelids upon tir'd eyes;
Music that brings sweet sleep down from the blissful skies.
Here are cool mosses deep,
And thro' the moss the ivies creep,
And in the stream the long-leaved flowers weep,
And from the craggy edge the poppy hangs in sleep.
Thursday, 17 July 2008
Common People Like You
Tuesday, 15 July 2008
Elegiac
Monday, 14 July 2008
Juvenilia
It might be fun to share 3 of these early poems I thought I'd lost. If nothing else, I think that it's an insight into the mind of an impressionable teenager - one who is a would-be poet, one who is mad on girls but too shy to approach them, one who worries equally about death and acne...
The smoke is clinging to the trees.
Your eyes are cloudy with blue smoke.
Your breath is redolent of leaves.
A man is sweeping into heaps
The leaves fresh fallen from the trees.
Your hands are stiller than my thoughts.
Your hair is yellow as the leaves.
The sun sinks low among the trees.
The heaps of leaves are now alight.
We watch the burning of the leaves.
They smoke all through the scented night.
We stand and watch the yellow dawn.
It gilds the frosted, leafless trees.
You weep into an ice-blue wind.
My thoughts revolve like falling leaves.
Leafy breath, eh? Interesting! I've obviously been reading too much Laurence Binyon or Rupert Brooke. Yet there's something about the atmosphere of this poem, with its hypnotic repetitions and faint air of mystery, that I don't find entirely displeasing even now...
The sixties saw her mini-skirted,
Beatle-mad and blonde. She flirted
With the multi-coloured shirted
Hip young dudes, to dope converted.
Now her breasts have lost their bouncing
Innocence. She's cool, not flouncing.
Tall and thin and trouser-suited,
Henna-haired and leather-booted.
The typist of the last decade
Was never typecast, born not made,
Her keyboard cast in greenest jade,
With jewelled keys, ribbons of braid.
But now she's full of seventies' sense,
Losing pounds and counting pence,
A house in Kent as recompense.
Is she serene or is she tense?
Or is she dreaming while she's typing,
Crashing keys with icy rage?
The noise is like a bird's wings breaking,
Beating on its gilded cage.
Mary
Others talk past you. But you are not deaf
To kindness or the lack of it,
Though subtleties slip by. You simply smile,
With a child's wonder, with an old maid's regret.
Catching a word or glance your jellied face
Sets in a smile, which we observe. We grin
Stupidly. Then, embarrassed, shift our gaze
From you back to each other. The frozen stream
Of conversation thaws, melting our silence,
But isolating yours. Your lineaments,
Drawn tight with joy, sag and collapse again.
Your loveless life knew just one brief affair:
A cyclist, who pedalled off one bright morning,
Whistling, to the war, and not returning,
Leaving you to rub and scrub away
His image with your housemaid's brush.
But memories are not effaced this way.
They lie deeper than all the dust and grime.
And now you wait in stillness, trapped by time.
Just yesterday, in city crowds, you trembled,
Suddenly more naked, more alone.
Your clumsy fingers clutched my arm. Your fear
Shook that frail domicile of skin and bone.
Saturday, 12 July 2008
We Are Stardust, We Are Golden
Hello? Are you looking? Can you see? Ah, there you are. And this is me. I know I must often disappoint you, as you often disappoint me. But that is a fact of life. It should not be a disappointing fact. It is just a fact of nature. That is all. If we are disappointed with each other we might as well say we are disappointed with a frog, or with the beached shards of flotsam and jetsam at the sea's edge, or with the gentle soughing of the wind in the alder trees encircling the lake. In other words, 'disappoint' is the wrong word. In this context the whole idea of 'disappointment' is the wrong idea, and a uniquely human idea.
I will put it another way. Here I am. And there you are. Yes, I am somewhere in here, and you are somewhere out there. Indisputable fact? I think you may be in a small space, perhaps in a woodpecker's hole, or in a hare's form maybe, hidden in a little resting place in the woods or the corn fields, in a small refuge scooped out and sheltered from the wind and the rain.
Or perhaps you are to be found in one of those bigger spaces, exposed in the vast nothingness or somethingness between the stars, in the interstices of thought, or somewhere out among the uncaring, ice-cold molecules of the oceans.
Wherever we are, whoever we are, we are both insignificant - from the perspective of the universe. But from another viewpoint - and everything has another viewpoint - we may possess some tiny piece of significance, some unique, pulsating, significant identifier, some beating energy pulsing at our own eccentric rate, an erratic rate unique to ourselves.
We are all frighteningly yet also comfortingly unique. We are all the product of a completely individual set of genes and influences and experiences and other unalterable circumstances. And if we can recognise this uniqueness, this potentially alienating, yet also healthy, human, natural, necessary, inevitable difference between us, and respect it, and not fear or fight or criticize or ignore or reject it, then I think we may be getting somewhere. We may even be able to embrace this unique difference which keeps us apart; indeed, in the end, it may be the very thing which binds us together.
Hello? Let's look. Let's look and see. Here am I and there are you and you and you and all of you. A million miles away, yet somewhere here inside of me too, in some peculiar, mystical, electromagnetic way. Didn't Joni Mitchell once sing about us all being stardust? And about getting ourselves back to the Garden?
Let us all bow our heads to the different gods within each one of us.
Namaste.
Thursday, 10 July 2008
Look And Learn
Wednesday, 9 July 2008
Irony And Pity
Hendrik Willem van Loon (1882-1944) was a Dutch-American historian and journalist. He reported on the 1905 Russian Revolution, and later became professor of history at Cornell University. He was a prolific writer of books, but his children's history book, The Story Of Mankind, is perhaps the best known. Since his death there have been many editions as the work has been constantly updated - originally by his son, then afterwards by other historians. It was first published in the US in 1921, and won the first John Newbery medal the following year. My own copy of this venerable book is the first British edition, published by George G. Harrap in September 1922.
The book begins like this. For some reason I've never been able to get these four simple but powerful sentences out of my mind since first reading them:
High up in the North in the land called Svithjod, there stands a rock. It is a hundred miles high and a hundred miles wide. Once every thousand years a little bird comes to this rock to sharpen its beak. When the rock has thus been worn away, then a single day of eternity will have gone by.
Beginnings (and endings and titles) of books are so important. The success or failure of a book can depend upon them - and I don't mean by this simply some clever marketing trick. Beginnings and endings and titles have a magical power either to draw you in or to exclude you for ever.
Talking of endings, I can't recall ever reading the ending of The Story Of Mankind. So I've just turned to it, and here it is:
'The more I think of the problems of our lives, the more I am persuaded that we ought to choose Irony and Pity for our assessors and judges as the ancient Egyptians called upon the Goddess Isis and the Goddess Nephtys on behalf of their dead. Irony and Pity are both of good counsel; the first with her smiles makes life agreeable; the other sanctifies it with her tears. The Irony which I invoke is no cruel Deity. She mocks neither love not beauty. She is gentle and kindly disposed. Her mirth disarms and it is she who teaches us to laugh at rogues and fools, whom but for her we might be so weak as to despise and hate.' And with these wise words of a very great Frenchman I bid you farewell.
Van Loon is quoting Anatole France here. All I can say is amen to the wisdom of it.
Wednesday, 2 July 2008
Ecstasy Of Truth
I feel compelled to write a few words about film-maker Werner Herzog, one of my favourite European arthouse directors, after reading Chris Townsend's latest post on Herzog's new 'documentary' film set in Antarctica, Encounters At The End Of The World, and after seeing Alan Yentob's reverential interview with Herzog on BBC1 last night.Although I've a lot of respect for New German Cinema in general - particularly for Rainer Werner Fassbinder and Wim Wenders - the director who really does it for me is Werner Herzog. When I was living in Frankfurt in the mid-1970s a friend and I went to a showing of Herzog's magnificent, hauntingly bleak film The Enigma Of Kaspar Hauser. It affected me most profoundly at the time. In this film the 'madman', the 'simpleton', the Dostoyevskian 'idiot' - played frighteningly well by Bruno S. who had never acted before - is totally misunderstood and often violently victimized by a 19th century German bürgerlich society.
Herzog's films and documentaries (for him fiction and non-fiction are always blurred) aspire to a kind of mystical revelation, and all are charged with poetry, resonate with meaning and are full of unforgettable images. These images may or may not be symbols - it appears to be intentionally vague. It seems to me his movies have a strong correlation with music - and the actual musical soundtracks to his films are always carefully thought out and indescribably evocative.
He has described the aim of his film-making as an ecstasy of truth.
This is Herzog's advice to someone who wants to make a career in film:
Work as a taxi driver, work as bouncer in a sex club, work as a warden in a lunatic asylum. Do something which is really into pura vida as the Mexicans would say, into the very pure essence of life. I would prefer you to work as bouncer in a sex club to earn money. You have to take the first steps yourself because nobody is going to be on your side. And once you have something presentable, from there it may or may not take off, but at least you have a much better chance. At least you can make the film.
Herzog hates the superficial naturalism of cinéma vérité:
...there are very deep strata of truth inherent in cinema which we have almost stopped asking for. I seek a deeper truth than the cinéma vérité truth which only scratches the surface.
I end by quoting in full Herzog's 1999 Minnesota Declaration:
Minnesota Declaration: Truth and Fact in Documentary Cinema "Lessons of Darkness"
1. By dint of declaration the so-called Cinema Vérité is devoid of vérité. It reaches a merely superficial truth, the truth of accountants.
2. One well-known representative of Cinema Vérité declared publicly that truth can be easily found by taking a camera and trying to be honest. He resembles the night watchman at the Supreme Court who resents the amount of written law and legal procedures. "For me," he says, "there should be only one single law: the bad guys should go to jail."Unfortunately, he is part right, for most of the many, much of the time.
3. Cinema Vérité confounds fact and truth, and thus plows only stones. And yet, facts sometimes have a strange and bizarre power that makes their inherent truth seem unbelievable.
4. Fact creates norms, and truth illumination.
5. There are deeper strata of truth in cinema, and there is such a thing as poetic, ecstatic truth. It is mysterious and elusive, and can be reached only through fabrication and imagination and stylization.
6. Filmmakers of Cinema Vérité resemble tourists who take pictures amid ancient ruins of facts.
7. Tourism is sin, and travel on foot virtue.
8. Each year at springtime scores of people on snowmobiles crash through the melting ice on the lakes of Minnesota and drown. Pressure is mounting on the new governor to pass a protective law. He, the former wrestler and bodyguard, has the only sage answer to this: "You can´t legislate stupidity."
9. The gauntlet is hereby thrown down.
10. The moon is dull. Mother Nature doesn´t call, doesn´t speak to you, although a glacier eventually farts. And don´t you listen to the Song of Life.
11. We ought to be grateful that the Universe out there knows no smile.
12. Life in the oceans must be sheer hell. A vast, merciless hell of permanent and immediate danger. So much of a hell that during evolution some species - including man - crawled, fled onto some small continents of solid land, where the Lessons of Darkness continue.
Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota April 30, 1999